BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sabre//Sabre VObject 4.5.8//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Zurich
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Zurich
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/Zurich
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19810329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19961027T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:news1703@dmi.unibas.ch
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20241001T122056
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20241025T110000
SUMMARY:Seminar in Numerical Analysis: Andreas Veeser (University of Milan)
  
DESCRIPTION:In the context of finite element methods for boundary value pro
 blems\, the goal of an a posteriori error analysis is to derive a so-calle
 d error estimator. Such an estimator should be a quantity that is computab
 le in terms of the problem data and the finite element solution and equiva
 lent to its error. Almost all error estimators available in literature\, h
 owever\, do not meet these requirements. Indeed\, equivalence is typically
  verified only up to so-called (data) oscillations and their presence has 
 been viewed as the price of computability.\\r\\nThe talk will consist of t
 wo parts. The first part will argue that the infinite-dimensional nature o
 f the problem data is an obstruction to computability\, while the typical 
 form of oscillations obstructs equivalence. In other words: the desirable 
 but missing unspoiled equivalence is not only a technical problem but does
  not hold for the involved oscillations.\\r\\nThe second part will then pr
 esent the new approach to a posteriori error estimation proposed by [1]. I
 ts resulting estimators are equivalent to the error and consist of two par
 ts\, where the first one is of finite-dimensional nature and thus computab
 le\, while the second one is a new form of data oscillation\, which is alw
 ays smaller that the old one and whose computability hinges on the knowled
 ge of the problem data. This splitting of the error estimator is also conv
 enient in guiding adaptive algorithms\; cf. [2].\\r\\n[1] C. Kreuzer\, A. 
 Veeser\, Oscillation in a posteriori error estimation\, Numer. Math. 148 (
 2021)\, 43-78 [2] A. Bonito\, C. Canuto\, R. H. Nochetto\, A. Veeser\, Ada
 ptive finite element methods\, Acta Numerica 33 (2024)\, 163-485.\\r\\n\\r
 \\nFor further information about the seminar\, please visit this webpage [
 t3://page?uid=1115].
X-ALT-DESC:<p>In the context of finite element methods for boundary value p
 roblems\, the goal of an a posteriori error analysis is to derive a so-cal
 led error estimator. Such an estimator should be a quantity that is comput
 able in terms of the problem data and the finite element solution and equi
 valent to its error. Almost all error estimators available in literature\,
  however\, do not meet these requirements. Indeed\, equivalence is typical
 ly verified only up to so-called (data) oscillations and their presence ha
 s been viewed as the price of computability.</p>\n<p>The talk will consist
  of two parts. The first part will argue that the infinite-dimensional nat
 ure of the problem data is an obstruction to computability\, while the typ
 ical form of oscillations obstructs equivalence. In other words: the desir
 able but missing unspoiled equivalence is not only a technical problem but
  does not hold for the involved oscillations.</p>\n<p>The second part will
  then present the new approach to a posteriori error estimation proposed b
 y [1]. Its resulting estimators are equivalent to the error and consist of
  two parts\, where the first one is of finite-dimensional nature and thus 
 computable\, while the second one is a new form of data oscillation\, whic
 h is always smaller that the old one and whose computability hinges on the
  knowledge of the problem data. This splitting of the error estimator is a
 lso convenient in guiding adaptive algorithms\; cf. [2].</p>\n<p>[1] C. Kr
 euzer\, A. Veeser\, Oscillation in a posteriori error estimation\, Numer. 
 Math. 148 (2021)\, 43-78<br /> [2] A. Bonito\, C. Canuto\, R. H. Nochetto\
 , A. Veeser\, Adaptive finite element methods\, Acta Numerica 33 (2024)\, 
 163-485.</p>\n\n<p>For further information about the seminar\, please visi
 t this <a href="t3://page?uid=1115" title="Opens internal link in current 
 window">webpage</a>.</p>
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20241025T120000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
